tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18687830.post7620346255144730376..comments2008-11-11T05:21:46.815-08:00Andrys Bastenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05109282436243758435noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18687830.post-52085967311931672832008-03-09T22:19:00.000-07:002008-03-09T22:19:00.000-07:00

To anonymous #2, (though jawbone did sign his and I've seen him on a forum) -- no, I just drew attention to Freepers forum being the source of the Kenya photo that was newly scanned on Feb. 23 by a member and posted there that night, was much discussed and re-loaded there for the two days (and obviously much emailed around) before Drudge reported it on the 25th as coming from the Clinton campaign

Andryshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05109282436243758435noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18687830.post-73739809616081579142008-03-09T21:47:00.000-07:002008-03-09T21:47:00.000-07:00

Andrys,<BR/><BR/>Are you saying the Drudge photo and Freeper pic share the same exif data?

Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18687830.post-43758335535956657342008-03-04T18:21:00.000-08:002008-03-04T18:21:00.000-08:00

jawbone,<BR/> On several commenter areas all over the Net, Obama supporters actually LIKE to blame Clinton for this (as Obama immediately did, relying on Drudge as emininently trustworthy source, and unifying his supporters if not the party), but when I bring up the facts involved here, there is zero interest in them by those people. Surprise?

Andryshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05109282436243758435noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18687830.post-33198034219924814672008-03-04T16:12:00.000-08:002008-03-04T16:12:00.000-08:00

Thank you for doing this research.<BR/>This and Dave Johnson's Seeing the Forest should put the controversy to rest.<BR/><BR/>Riiiiiiight.<BR/>jawbone

Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com